I've revised my rating system, 5/10 used to be good on my scale. Now 8/10 is good.
I mention only the active staff members. All the ones not mentioned, get a 0/10
Does a good job with keeping the forum clean. Only 9/10
for not backing up Pie. Always back up the mods in the public, what you do in the staff forum is another matter.Psy:
Still posting news here and keeping the site alive. Skilled forum builder. As far as I can remember, never done something I disapprove of. Only 9/10
for not backing up your mods in the public, otherwise it would have been 10.Edit: Grade temporary(?) reduced to 4/10 due to neglect. TreeFitty:
Uh. Off the scale. Keeps the forum clean. Still posting news here even though I'm the only member still using this forum. Not a perfect mod, but maybe the best mod I have met on approx. 35 forums, perhaps better than me. Bonus for not taking offense of my jokes. 11/10
. No, wait a minute, I think I can remember you being a c0unt one time(?), sorry pal but you only get 10/10.
QUOTE (Iced Coke @ Dec 7 2009, 06:29 PM)
Is that idiot/twat pieface still here? I'm awfully surprised if he is, it's like you know your co worker is corrupt, but you just don't give a shit, as you're a bunch of lazy tossers, right?
Hypothetically speaking, of course.
QUOTE (Iced Coke @ Dec 7 2009, 10:10 PM)
Been here since 06, so I doubt my post count entitles me to explaining, but I'l go ahead anyway. He;s foolish, unable to act correctly, one such example is he gave someone a week ban for swearing at him. Hardly a just reason. Everyone agrees, he's awful.
How did these malicious posts pass un-modded?
Even if it is true what QD said and Pie was too trigger-happy, I have to side with Pie here, because being rude here is wrong regardless. I know this is old and no one cares now, but I'm angry and need to say this.
QUOTE (DuffMan @ Dec 7 2009, 09:34 PM)
a moderator anyone has always been a suspendable offence. He just saved the rest of us a job by doing it himself.
QUOTE (Massacre @ Dec 12 2009, 06:05 AM)
QUOTE (DuffMan @ Dec 7 2009, 04:34 PM)
Flaming a moderator has always been a suspendable offence. He just saved the rest of us a job by doing it himself.
Just curious, but what does it matter? As long as the flame is in R+R where flames are allowed (though I think the flame directed at Pie was in the Asylum), I don't see how insulting a mod is any different from insulting a regular member. The only real difference is that a mod can actually do something about it (i.e., unjustified suspensions).
I'd say 1/10 for staff that think they deserve to be treated differently than the other members, and 8/10 for the staff members that don't.
Massacre you're not eligible for rating here, if you were, I would give you 10/10 for saying that in bold.