IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Stalin's goal was to start war with Germany
Bain
post Apr 18 2008, 11:12 PM
Post #1


Rat
Group Icon

Group: Gold Member
Posts: 184
Joined: 17-February 05
Member No.: 9,884



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Suvorov

What do you think about this article?

Its an interesting set of ideas and would make total sense, but does it?

What do you guys have to say?


--------------------
BAIN POINTS:

Pickles: +7
D-O: +88
Mekstizzle: +10
QD: -10
Frog Choker: + 13
Analogkid: -25
Psy: -8
Ast: +10
Treefitty: -10
Viceman: -59*
Massacre: +5
Spoiler: -14
Voodoo: +17

*= Fail
Achievements
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Un-Amurikan Bast...
post Apr 19 2008, 03:32 AM
Post #2


Upstanding Citizen


Group: Members
Posts: 0
Joined: 1-July 05
From: I try to be directly above the center of the earth
Member No.: 17,310



It isn't all that farfetched, given that Hitler attacked the USSR because he knew they were going to attack him, and also given how Stalin acted after the Nazi defeat (setting up the Soviet bloc). Hitler just found it strategically more sound to attack the Red Army when it was weak and piss-poor rather than be attacked by it when it was re-equipped and actually prepared for any kind of fighting. In all honesty, I thought the idea that Stalin was planning to attack the Nazis was a founded idea; I didn't know it was being debated really.


--------------------

QUOTE(Styx)
Dancin' on a landmine baby one leg left, I can still crawl and I'm not dead yet. You better get a bigger gun, I'm not dead yet.


QUOTE(K. M. Munshi)
Have a scripture to recite, but make your own path.

Achievements
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ulster_Niko
post Apr 19 2008, 12:36 PM
Post #3


Upstanding Citizen


Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 20-March 08
From: Northern Ireland
Member No.: 38,823



I don't think Stalin ever held such an aggressive view with regards to Nazi Germany. Stalin's prime concern in Soviet Foreign Policy was gaining security for the USSR, this would not been achieved by attacking a militarily strong Nazi Germany with a large, but weak Red Army. More likely was that he wanted the Allies and the Axis to destroy each other whilst the USSR moved in to pick up the pieces and establish authority in Europe.


--------------------
You'll Never Walk Alone

Liverpool FC
Achievements
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AlkaliLizard
post Apr 19 2008, 02:45 PM
Post #4


Upstanding Citizen


Group: New Members
Posts: 0
Joined: 17-April 08
Member No.: 39,535



That sounds interesting, I'm not in school so I'm probably not the greatest at History, but I used to be ok at it. I kind of worry that this kind of view might lead to people trying to pin the blame of the Second World War entirely on Stalin instead of squarely on Hitler. I know by 1941 Stalin was definatly in control of the USSR but don't know whether he could safely start a major war with a powerful enemy without facing some kind of backlash from his own party, although knowing how Stalin planned and acted mostly on his own I would say that it's not unlikely he had that kind of plan. I mean, he must of been thinking what he would do after Nazi Germany was inevitably defeated. Hitler wasn't as smart as Stalin so it makes sense that he could have been duped.

This post has been edited by AlkaliLizard: Apr 19 2008, 02:46 PM
Achievements
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Un-Amurikan Bast...
post Apr 20 2008, 11:54 PM
Post #5


Upstanding Citizen


Group: Members
Posts: 0
Joined: 1-July 05
From: I try to be directly above the center of the earth
Member No.: 17,310



QUOTE(Ulster_Niko @ Apr 19 2008, 06:36 AM) [snapback]1415558[/snapback]
I don't think Stalin ever held such an aggressive view with regards to Nazi Germany. Stalin's prime concern in Soviet Foreign Policy was gaining security for the USSR, this would not been achieved by attacking a militarily strong Nazi Germany with a large, but weak Red Army. More likely was that he wanted the Allies and the Axis to destroy each other whilst the USSR moved in to pick up the pieces and establish authority in Europe.

The USSR was only concerned with security after the second World War, because they'd been trashed by foreign invaders twice in almost 30 years at that point. The Red Army was only weak at the time of Operation Barbarossa - by around 1943 it was something to contend with, given the T-34s and all the new weaponry and equipment that was introduced, let alone tactics that allowed them to deal with the Wehrmacht. This combined with the weakening agent of the Allies would have made such an attack by Russia not so far from feasable.

@AlkaliLizard
You can't really place the cause of WWII on Stalin over Hitler no matter what you do. Fact is Hitler started it and the Allies bent over and let him. It also depends on how you like to place blame. I for one blame all those responsible for the Treaty of Versailles.

And I doubt any kind of "backlash" - Stalin was the party and nobody dared dispute that. Even during the war when Stalin proved himself among the most incapable military commanders in history, noone dared advise him (and those who did saw quite a fate...).

And also you use "inevitably defeated" pretty loosely. I hate going into theoreticals, but the Normandy invasion was arguably what ultimately led to Germany's defeat; with that in mind, the Normandy invasion was a pretty fragile operation and could have been totally thrashed if Rommel had used his tanks. I'm just saying that you can't entirely dismiss the possibility that Hitler could have gone much farther than he did - it's these possibilities that help us learn the most.

And also, Hitler and Stalin were both very intelligent men. Hitler was the epitome of political brilliance and had the sense to place the technicals of the war in the hands of capable men whom he could trust. Stalin was a paranoid and unstable man who trusted nobody and preferred to direct things with his own hand at nearly the cost of the entire war. I don't think one can fairly say that either man was any smarter than the other...


--------------------

QUOTE(Styx)
Dancin' on a landmine baby one leg left, I can still crawl and I'm not dead yet. You better get a bigger gun, I'm not dead yet.


QUOTE(K. M. Munshi)
Have a scripture to recite, but make your own path.

Achievements
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NCP
post May 5 2008, 08:57 AM
Post #6


Nobody Special
Group Icon

Group: Gold Member
Posts: 28
Joined: 2-August 04
From: Soest, Netherlands
Member No.: 73



Yeah it's plausible, but then I'm asking myself this: why did Stalin eliminate his generals when he was planning an attack?
I mean that's why he lost so much and so fast in the beginning of '43.


--------------------
Achievements
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
0bs3n3
post May 5 2008, 09:50 AM
Post #7


Leece
**

Group: Members
Posts: 207
Joined: 26-September 05
From: Aussie Land
Member No.: 24,792



QUOTE(Un-Amurikan Bastage @ Apr 21 2008, 09:54 AM) [snapback]1417006[/snapback]
And also, Hitler and Stalin were both very intelligent men. Hitler was the epitome of political brilliance and had the sense to place the technicals of the war in the hands of capable men whom he could trust. Stalin was a paranoid and unstable man who trusted nobody and preferred to direct things with his own hand at nearly the cost of the entire war. I don't think one can fairly say that either man was any smarter than the other...


But not enough of it was placed in their hands. You could argue that if Hitler did not act like he was a great military mastermind (he was only a Corporal in WWI, but he thought he was an amazing strategist) they could of gone a lot further if not won the war. Might be a bit of a wild claim, I'll put it out there and see what happens though.
Achievements
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Caliph
post May 5 2008, 12:45 PM
Post #8


Nobody Special


Group: Members
Posts: 20
Joined: 24-February 08
From: Liberty City
Member No.: 38,605



Stalin's war against Nazi Germany was the only thing I disliked about the Allied Front during World War II. Stalin was just as bad as Hitler, or even worse, when it came down to treating his own people.


--------------------
Playstation 3 80GB | Grand Theft Auto IV | Sony HDTV
Achievements
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BIG FUCKING SPID...
post May 5 2008, 03:17 PM
Post #9


Upstanding Citizen


Group: Members
Posts: 0
Joined: 25-March 05
From: Leeds
Member No.: 10,974



QUOTE(Caliph @ May 5 2008, 01:45 PM) [snapback]1430597[/snapback]
Stalin's war against Nazi Germany was the only thing I disliked about the Allied Front during World War II. Stalin was just as bad as Hitler, or even worse, when it came down to treating his own people.

I think Stalin was the bigger bastard, he killed more Russians than the Hitler ever did(Indirectly of course)

Back to the original subject, Un-Amurikan Bastage is correct. Stalin had started a massive build up of his forces, cetainly preparing for action against Europe. Germany grabbed the inititive by invading earlier than the USSR would have expected, also at a time when the Red Army was largely disorganised following the war with Finland.

This post has been edited by BIG FUCKING SPIDER: May 5 2008, 03:17 PM
Achievements
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TrIgGeR HaPpY
post May 5 2008, 07:03 PM
Post #10


Upstanding Citizen


Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 3-August 04
From: England
Member No.: 440



Stalin is pretty messed up, he tried to breed humans with chimpanzee's to create a super human. And a creature that didnt complain about the food they eat. lol wtf


--------------------
Achievements
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bain
post May 8 2008, 03:38 AM
Post #11


Rat
Group Icon

Group: Gold Member
Posts: 184
Joined: 17-February 05
Member No.: 9,884



QUOTE(NCP @ May 5 2008, 03:57 AM) [snapback]1430529[/snapback]
Yeah it's plausible, but then I'm asking myself this: why did Stalin eliminate his generals when he was planning an attack?
I mean that's why he lost so much and so fast in the beginning of '43.



Maybe he wanted better generals to attack with or some new ones he thought were better suited or more loyal for that particular war or cause? I have no fucking clue, actually.


--------------------
BAIN POINTS:

Pickles: +7
D-O: +88
Mekstizzle: +10
QD: -10
Frog Choker: + 13
Analogkid: -25
Psy: -8
Ast: +10
Treefitty: -10
Viceman: -59*
Massacre: +5
Spoiler: -14
Voodoo: +17

*= Fail
Achievements
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Caliph
post May 8 2008, 01:27 PM
Post #12


Nobody Special


Group: Members
Posts: 20
Joined: 24-February 08
From: Liberty City
Member No.: 38,605



I heard Stalin used to watch every single Russian movie before it was released to the public. He was also very vain and in love with himself, the guy appeared in almost every Russian movie ever made at that time.


--------------------
Playstation 3 80GB | Grand Theft Auto IV | Sony HDTV
Achievements
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Un-Amurikan Bast...
post May 22 2008, 11:28 PM
Post #13


Upstanding Citizen


Group: Members
Posts: 0
Joined: 1-July 05
From: I try to be directly above the center of the earth
Member No.: 17,310



QUOTE(NCP @ May 5 2008, 02:57 AM) [snapback]1430529[/snapback]
Yeah it's plausible, but then I'm asking myself this: why did Stalin eliminate his generals when he was planning an attack?
I mean that's why he lost so much and so fast in the beginning of '43.

Because he was paranoid - he wanted all of it to be controlled and planned by his self because he thought no one else could fulfill his vision without fucking it up. And generals are very close to the big man and very powerful individuals...he feared a coup, he feared assassination, he feared the threat of intelligent men in such high places with such power with him.


--------------------

QUOTE(Styx)
Dancin' on a landmine baby one leg left, I can still crawl and I'm not dead yet. You better get a bigger gun, I'm not dead yet.


QUOTE(K. M. Munshi)
Have a scripture to recite, but make your own path.

Achievements
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NCP
post May 23 2008, 03:59 PM
Post #14


Nobody Special
Group Icon

Group: Gold Member
Posts: 28
Joined: 2-August 04
From: Soest, Netherlands
Member No.: 73



Ofcourse, but if he was planning an attack on Germany he wouldn't do that, because you can't run a war on your own. Especially in the 40s it's unthinkable to not have a commander on the front. I know why he did the Great Purge, but in this situation it just doesn't make sense. Even a moron would know that's the dumbest thing to do when preparing for war. He was lucky he had general Zhukov, because he succesfully defended Leningrad and won Stalingrad which was the turning point. But I guess you misunderstood my post.


--------------------
Achievements
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Un-Amurikan Bast...
post May 24 2008, 11:47 PM
Post #15


Upstanding Citizen


Group: Members
Posts: 0
Joined: 1-July 05
From: I try to be directly above the center of the earth
Member No.: 17,310



QUOTE(NCP @ May 23 2008, 09:59 AM) [snapback]1440404[/snapback]
Ofcourse, but if he was planning an attack on Germany he wouldn't do that, because you can't run a war on your own. Especially in the 40s it's unthinkable to not have a commander on the front. I know why he did the Great Purge, but in this situation it just doesn't make sense. Even a moron would know that's the dumbest thing to do when preparing for war. He was lucky he had general Zhukov, because he succesfully defended Leningrad and won Stalingrad which was the turning point. But I guess you misunderstood my post.

Ah, I see what you're saying - I guess I did. In that case yeah, there was really no logic there, mental fixations or not. I don't even know. He wasn't a retard, so it doesn't really make any sense there either. Maybe he did understand that need for a commander, hence why he kept those generals that we now recognize as having saved the USSR, like Zhukov?


--------------------

QUOTE(Styx)
Dancin' on a landmine baby one leg left, I can still crawl and I'm not dead yet. You better get a bigger gun, I'm not dead yet.


QUOTE(K. M. Munshi)
Have a scripture to recite, but make your own path.

Achievements
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd July 2014 - 01:35 PM

GTA 5 | GTA San Andreas | Red Dead Redemption | GTA 4